Unitary vision and coordination testing center

ABSTRACT

System and methods for testing and/or training a subject&#39;s vision and coordination abilities are provided. More specifically, the method may include testing various aspects of the subject&#39;s vision and coordination abilities, such as eye-hand coordination, split attention, reaction time, body coordination, etc. By using various tests, an efficient examination may be administered. In accordance with the invention, an individual may be subjected to such a method of testing and/or training at a unitary center capable of presenting such tests to the individual, receiving input from the individual, and processing the received input. Such a unitary test center may further be configurable, so that the tests administered may vary based on the needs of the individual. The received input may then, for example, be used to compute data related to the user&#39;s vision and coordination abilities, both overall and for each individual test.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No.60/923,434 filed on Apr. 13, 2007, entitled “System and Method forTesting Visual Ability During Simulated Activity,” which is herebyincorporated by reference. This application also claims priority to U.S.Provisional Application No. 60/941,915 filed on Jun. 4, 2007, entitled“System and Method for Decoupled Visual Ability Testing,” which ishereby incorporated by reference.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

Not applicable.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates generally to the evaluation and/ortraining of an individual's vision and coordination.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Along with physical ability, an individual's sight plays a role in theindividual's performance when participating in an activity, such as asport. Typically, to improve in the sport or activity, an individualwill focus on improving their physical ability to elevate their overallperformance. By testing and training the individual's vision andcoordination abilities or acuity, however, the individual's performancemay also improve.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in asimplified form that are further described below in the DetailedDescription. This Summary is not intended to identify key features oressential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended tobe used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subjectmatter.

In accordance with the invention, a method of testing and/or training asubject's vision and coordination abilities is provided. Morespecifically, the method may include testing various aspects of thesubject's vision and coordination ability at a unitary testing center.By using various tests, a more streamlined examination may beadministered. In accordance with the invention, an individual may besubjected to such a method of testing and/or training at a unitarycenter capable of presenting vision and coordination tests to theindividual, receiving input from the individual, and processing thereceived input. Such a unitary test center may further be configurable,so that the tests administered may vary based on the needs of theindividual. The received input may then, for example, be used to computedata related to the user's vision and coordination ability, both overalland for each individual test.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention is described in detail below with reference to theattached drawing figures, wherein:

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a computing system environment suitable foruse in implementing the present invention;

FIG. 2 illustrates a block diagram of an exemplary testing component foruse in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 3 illustrates a block diagram of an exemplary processing componentfor use in implementing the present invention;

FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary unitary vision and coordination testingunit, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 5 illustrates another embodiment of a unitary vision andcoordination testing unit, in accordance with the present invention; and

FIG. 6 illustrates a flow diagram showing a method for testing thevision and coordination abilities of a subject at a unitary location, inaccordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The subject matter of the present invention is described withspecificity herein to meet statutory requirements. However, thedescription itself is not intended to limit the scope of this patent.Rather, the inventors have contemplated that the claimed subject mattermight also be embodied in other ways, to include different steps orcombinations of steps similar to the ones described in this document, inconjunction with other present or future technologies.

In accordance with the present invention, systems and methods fortesting a subject's vision and coordination abilities at a unitarytesting unit are provided. Such a method may include testing variousaspects of the subject's vision and coordination abilities (e.g.,eye-hand coordination, split attention, reaction time, bodycoordination, etc.) at a unitary testing unit that may also be capableof processing the resulting data and/or transmitting data over a networkto another location for processing. In doing so, the unitary testingcenter may streamline the process of testing the vision and coordinationabilities of subject, and may reduce overhead (e.g., reduce theequipment) needed to perform testing. Additionally, the unitary testingcenter may be configurable, so that the tests administered may varybased on the needs of the individual. The received input may then, forexample, be used to compute results related to the user's vision andcoordination abilities, both overall and for each individual test.

In one embodiment, a testing device for testing the vision andcoordination ability of a subject is provided. Such a testing device mayinclude a presenting component, an input component, and a processingcomponent, where the presenting component is capable of presenting avisual clarity test, a contrast sensitivity test, a visual trackingtest, a distance focusing test, and a visual aiming test to the subject.In response to each test, the subject may provide input to the testingdevice. The input component may then be configured to receive the input,and the processing component may be configured to process the receivedinput.

In another embodiment, a method for testing the vision and coordinationabilities of a subject, where the method occurs at a unitary location,is provided. The method comprises, in part, administering two or morevision ability tests to the test subject; receiving input from the testsubject in response to each test; and processing the input received fromthe test subject.

Referring to the drawings in general, and initially to FIG. 1 inparticular, a block diagram of an exemplary computing system is shownand designated generally as computing system 100 configured to providefor testing the visual and coordination abilities of a subject. It willbe understood and appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art thatthe computing system 100 shown in FIG. 1 is merely an example of onesuitable computing system environment and is not intended to suggest anylimitation as to the scope of use or functionality of embodiments of thepresent invention. Neither should the computing system 100 beinterpreted as having any dependency or requirement to any singlecomponent or combination of components illustrated therein.

The computing system 100 includes an input device 102, a display device120, a database 104, a central location 106, and a test unit 110, all incommunication with one another via a connection 108. The connection 108may be made by wire (such as a cable), or wireless (such as a wirelessnetwork). Connection 108 may also be a network, where the network mayinclude, without limitation, one or more local area networks (LANs)and/or wide area networks (WANs). Such networking environments arecommonplace in enterprise-wide computer networks, intranets, and theInternet. Further, the connection 108 may comprise a locally wiredconnection between components of computing system 100. Accordingly, theconnection 108 is not further described herein.

The input device 102 is capable of receiving one or more responses froma subject. Input device 102 may be any device that may receive responsesfrom a subject. One skilled in the art will appreciate that more thanone input device, such as input device 102, may be used with computingsystem 100. Input device 102 may be, for example, a microphone,joystick, game pad, wireless device, keyboard, keypad, game controller,treadmill, force plate, eye tracking system, gesture recognition system,touch sensitive screen, and/or any other input-initiating component thatprovides wired or wireless data to the test unit 110, which may bereceived through the network 108. Input device 102 may include voicerecognition equipment and/or software that processes auditory inputsfrom the test subject. For example, the auditory input from the subject,in order to show recognition of the visual indicia, may be averbalization of the trait possessed by the visual indicia. In oneembodiment, if the trait is a direction orientation of a Landolt “C,”the responsive auditory inputs may be “up,” “down,” “right,” and “left.”However, one skilled in the art will understand and appreciate thatother auditory inputs may be used (e.g., stating a color, numeral,letter, symbol, etc.) to indicate that the subject perceived and/orrecognized the visual indicia. It should be noted, however, that thepresent invention is not limited to implementation on such input devices102, but may be implemented on any of a variety of different types ofdevices within the scope of embodiments hereof. Input indicating thesubject's response to a displayed visual indicia may be received andcaptured with input device 102. If the trait is a directionalorientation, a satisfactory test response may be identifying thedirection that the visual indicia is facing. By way of example only,without limitation, identifying may include the subject providing inputby manipulating a joystick in a direction corresponding to thedirectional orientation on a hand-held device employed as the inputdevice 102.

If input device 102 is an eye tracking system, the position and/or focusof the eyes of subject may be monitored and an input registered when theeyes are positioned and/or focused at the proper location.

If input device 102 is a gesture recognition system, a variety ofsystems and/or methods may be used to receive inputs. For example, oneor more cameras may be used to monitor the movement of a subject's bodylimbs and/or extremities and, in conjunction with appropriate hardwareand/or software, register an input when subject makes an appropriategesture. Gesture recognition systems may also utilize optical markersattached to subject to facilitate motion tracking. Transmitters attachedto subject and receivers (for example, utilizing radio infrared, sonic,subsonic, or ultrasonic transmissions) may also be utilized as part of agesture recognition system.

If input device 102 is a touch sensitive screen, any type of touchsensitive screen may be utilized. Also, an overlay of a touch sensitivematerial may be used to receive touch inputs in conjunction with adisplay that is not itself touch sensitive. Such an overlay may be anydistance from the display.

The display device 120 may be capable of displaying output videovisually observable by a subject and may be any type of computer,testing apparatus, or television monitor, including cathode ray tube,liquid crystal display, plasma screen, or any other display type, or maycomprise a screen upon which images are projected, either from the frontor from the rear. Further, the display device 120 may provide a userinterface for a test administrator to interact with the test unit 110before, during, and after administering the vision ability tests to atest subject.

The test unit 110, as shown in FIG. 1, may be any type of computingdevice, embodiments of which will be more fully discussed below withreference to FIGS. 4 and 5. The database 104 may be configured to storeinformation associated with tests of vision and coordination abilities.It will be understood and appreciated by those of ordinary skill in theart that the information stored in the database 104 may be configurableand may include any information relevant to the testing of vision andcoordination abilities. The content and volume of such information arenot intended to limit the scope of embodiments of the present inventionin any way. Although illustrated as a single, independent component,database 104 may, in fact, be a plurality of database, for instance, adatabase cluster. Further, portions or the entirety of the database 104may reside on a computing device associated with the test unit 110,another external computing device (not shown), and/or any combinationthereof. One skilled in the art should appreciate that database 104 isoptional and need not be implemented in conjunction with the computingsystem 100.

Returning to FIG. 1, the test unit 110 may include a presentingcomponent 112, an input component 114, a testing component 116, and aprocessing component 118, shown in accordance with an embodiment of thepresent invention. It will be understood by those of ordinary skill inthe art that the components 112, 114, 116, and 118 illustrated in FIG. 1are exemplary in nature and in number, and should not be construed aslimiting. Any number of components may be employed to achieve thedesired functionality within the scope of embodiments of the presentinvention.

The presenting component 112 may be capable of displaying output videovisually observable by a subject and may be any type of computer,testing apparatus, or television monitor, including cathode ray tube,liquid crystal display, plasma screen, or any other display type, or maycomprise a screen upon which images are projected, either from the frontor from the rear.

In one embodiment, presenting component 112 may be an apparatus thatuses mirror and/or lenses strategically placed to generate a visualperspective of distance within a limited spatial area (e.g., providing aperiphery configuration of mirrors to produce a tunnel effect). Anexample of such an apparatus is a perspective testing apparatusutilizing mirrors to generate a perspective of distance. Such anapparatus may include a mirror that displays the visual indicia in acentral foveal area (i.e., directly in front of the subject), and mayfurther include side mirrors that display a visual indicia to testperipheral visual ability.

In another embodiment, an apparatus may include lenses that changeperceived distance and/or size of the displayed visual indicia toachieve a simulated distance. As a result, such an apparatus may providea displayed visual indicia that appears to the test subject to be neareror farther than the actual display. Thus, this configuration creates theperspective of optical infinity to the test subject.

One skilled in the art will appreciate that presenting component 112 maycomprise multiple devices that, in combination, display some of thevisual stimuli typical for a particular activity. In one embodiment, asingle device may be used to display multiple displays of visual indicia(e.g., split-screen).

Presenting component 112 may alternatively comprise display glasses,goggles, visors, and the like, that may be worn by a subject to providea visual display for the subject that is not typically visible toothers. Additionally, presenting component 112 may provide a twodimensional or three dimensional image to the test subject. The threedimensional image display may include virtual reality or holographicpresentations to the subject.

In operation, the presenting component 112 may be configured to presentone or more visual indicia to a test subject. As discussed more fullybelow, presenting component 112 may present visual indicia in varyingways to test different aspects of the subject's vision and coordinationabilities. In general, each of the visual indicia may possess a trait ortraits. This trait may be, for example, a directional orientation (e.g.,arrow, Landolt “C”, Tumbling E, etc.), a position on a user interface(e.g., located in a particular quadrant of the display), one of apredetermined number of mutually exclusive traits (e.g., indicator thatfaces either up, down, left, or right), or any combination of traits.Further, one of ordinary skill in the art will understand and appreciatethat other traits may be used, and the present invention is not limitedto any particular trait.

The input component 114 may be configured to receive input from the testsubject (e.g., by utilizing input device 102). Any suitable receivingcomponent that is capable of receiving input provided by the subject maybe used in accordance with this invention. By way of example, withoutlimitation, the subject may provide input utilizing a keyboard,joystick, trackball, or the like. The input may depend upon thepresenting component. For example, if the presenting component istouch-sensitive, the subject could provide input by touching thepresenting component. In another embodiment, the input component couldhave voice recognition capability, where the subject may provide inputwith a vocalized response that is recognized by the input component. Oneskilled in the art will understand and appreciate that any suitableinput component may be used in accordance with the present invention.Certain types may be preferred based on the tests presented by thepresenting component and, as discussed above, the capabilities of thepresenting component. After receiving input from the subject, the inputcomponent 114 may store the input, for instance, in database 104 forfuture reference.

The testing component 116 is configured to provide tests to the subject.As will be discussed more fully below with respect to FIG. 2, testingcomponent 116 may provide two or more tests to determine the vision andcoordination abilities of a subject. More specifically, multiple testsmay be provided at a unitary location, such as test unit 110. Further,testing component 116 is configurable so that the tests may varydepending on the subject. For example, the tests may vary given the testsubject's particularized sport or activity, competition level, visualstrengths/weaknesses, etc. Thus, the testing component 116 may also beresponsible for determining the tests (and level or difficulty of tests)presented by the presenting component 112.

The processing component 118 is provided to process the input receivedby input component 114. As shown in FIG. 3, the processing component 118may comprise a scoring component 310, a data collection component 312, atraining development component 314, and a delivery component 316. Thescoring component 310 may be configured to utilize a scoring algorithmto derive a score based on the subject's response to the testspresented. The subject's responses may be determined by comparing suchresponse to those from a particular population, typically retrieved fromthe database 104. The scoring component 310 may provide an evaluation ofthe vision and coordination abilities of the subject incident toreceiving and measuring one or more responses to the visual indicia.Once a score (e.g., percentile) is determined, it may be presented tothe subject via presenting component 112. The score may be presented atthe conclusion of each test, at the conclusion of all tests, or acombination thereof.

The data collection component 312 is configured to collect the datareceived from input component 114. Such data may then be stored, forexample, in database 104. The data collected may further be used tocreate standards for a particular population, which may then be used byscoring component 310. One of skill in the art will appreciate thatdatabase and 104 and/or scoring component 310 may be located remotelyfrom other components of system 100.

The training development component 314 is configured to develop atraining plan or regimen for the test subject based on the collecteddata and determined scores. In embodiments of the present invention,test unit 110 may be used for training the test subject, after thesubject has undergone testing.

The delivery component 316 is configured to transmit the determinedscore, collected data, and the like to presenting component 112. Thedelivery component 316 may additionally provide this data to an externalcomputing device, such as central location 106, for furtherconsideration, analysis, or storage. In one embodiment, the deliverycomponent 316 may provide data in real time to testing component 116,such that the tests may be configured or varied while still in thetesting process. It should be understood and appreciated by those ofordinary skill in the art that, although embodiments and examples arediscussed above, the delivery component 316 may provide informationrelated to testing vision and coordination abilities to any component ofthe computing system 100, both internal and external to the test unit110.

One skilled in the art will appreciate that the delivery component 316may send information from test unit 110 at any desired frequency. Thatis, the information may be sent to a desired location, for example,after a subject completes all tests or, alternatively, after eachindividual test. If sending the information to central location 106 ordatabase 104 for storage and/or processing, the information may be sentcollectively for all subjects at the end of the day. The frequency maydepend upon the storage capacity and processing capability of the testunit 110, as well as the desired use of the information.

Referring now to FIG. 2, testing component 116 is further illustrated.Testing component 116 may comprise an eye-hand coordination component210, a split attention component 212, a reaction time component 214, abody coordination component 216, and/or any other type of visual testingcomponent. Each of these components may be used by test unit 110 to testvarious aspects of an individual's vision and coordination abilities.One skilled in the art will appreciate that other tests may be used andare within the scope of the invention.

The eye-hand coordination component 210 is configured to test the visualclarity of a subject, and may include displaying a visual indicia indifferent locations and requiring the test subject to locate the visualindicia at each location. Any visual indicia may be used. In oneembodiment, the visual indicia may be presented using a display deviceas the presenting component 112, where the display device is touchsensitive and thus also serves as an input device. In such anembodiment, the test subject may locate the visual indicia by touchingthe display device, and this response is inputted into the test unit110. One skilled in the art will appreciate and understand that anysuitable test that tests a subject's eye-hand coordination may be usedby the eye-hand coordination component 210.

The split attention component 212 is configured to test the coordinationof a test subject while focusing on a visual indicia in a differentlocation. In one embodiment, a visual indicia is presented to a subjectsimilar to visual indicia presented to the subject in the example of theeye-hand coordination test described above. To test split attention, asecond visual indicia is presented in a different location from thefirst visual indicia, where the subject may be required to identify thefirst visual indicia while locating the second visual indicia. Thesecond visual indicia may, for example, be a Landolt “C,” where the testsubject is required to identify the direction orientation of the secondvisual indicia. The second visual indicia may be presented in the centerof a display device, while a first visual indicia testing the subject'seye-hand coordination may be presented on the display device away fromthe center of the display. One skilled in the art will appreciate andunderstand that any suitable test of split attention may be used by thesplit attention component 212.

The reaction time component 214 is configured to test the reaction timeof a test subject. Any suitable test may be used and is within the scopeof this invention. By way of example, without limitation, a visualindicia may be presented to the test subject. The subject may berequired to recognize this first indicia by, for example, using thetouch-screen input device to touch the first indicia. Then, a secondvisual indicia may be displayed or presented to the subject, who thenmust recognize the second visual indicia by, for example, moving thehand that is touching the first indicia to touch the second indicia.Measuring the time required for a subject to indicate the second indiciaafter being displayed measures the reaction time of the subject.

The body coordination component 216 is configured to test the bodycoordination of a subject. One skilled the art will appreciate that anysuitable test that tests body coordination may be used. By way ofexample, without limitation, this component may utilize a balance boardto test a subject's body coordination, while administering a vision testsimultaneously. Such a test may include presenting a visual indicia in aspecified quadrant of a display device, and then requiring the subjectto indicate that quadrant by balancing on the board.

Referring now to FIG. 4, an exemplary vision and coordination testingsystem 400 is illustrated, in accordance with an embodiment of thepresent invention. A subject 410 participating in testing may use visualtesting system 400 to test the visual ability of subject 410 during anactivity. Test unit 412 comprises a display device 414 and an inputdevice 416. In this embodiment, the testing unit 412 may receive inputsfrom subject 410 via input device 416 that is connected (e.g., by awired or wireless connection) to test unit 412. One skilled in the artwill appreciate that subject 410 may provide input to test unit 412 viaany type of input device and that subject 412 may interact with inputdevice 416 through any means (e.g., physical interaction, voicerecognition) in order to provide the appropriate response. Moreover,this invention contemplates using more than one input device for varioustests. For example, in FIG. 4, the subject 410 is illustrated asstanding on a balance board 418, which may be used in certain tests,such as the body coordination test described above.

By having a unitary test unit, such as test unit 412, that is capable ofpresenting several tests to a subject, a better overall evaluation ofthe subject's vision and coordination abilities may be provided.Further, because test unit 412 may include processing capabilities, itis able to process the data, resulting in a determined score and/or atraining regimen for the subject.

FIG. 5 illustrates a vision and coordination testing system 500, inaccordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The test unit512 comprises a display device 514 and a an input device 516. The inputdevice 516 shown in FIG. 5 is illustrated as a set of manual buttons;however, any type of input device is contemplated to be within the scopeof this invention. In some embodiments, the display device 514 may betouch-sensitive, thereby allowing it to also serve as an input device.

Referring now to FIG. 6, a flow diagram 600 is illustrated that shows amethod of testing the vision and coordination abilities of a subject.Although the terms “step” and “block” are used hereinbelow to connotedifferent elements of methods employed, the terms should not beinterpreted as implying any particular order among or between varioussteps herein disclosed unless and except when the order of individualsteps is explicitly described. Initially, two or more vision and/orcoordination tests are administered to a test subject (e.g., utilizingtest unit 110 of FIG. 1). This is indicated at block 610. One skilled inthe art will appreciate that any of the tests described above may beadministered, as well as any other test that measures an individual'svision and coordination abilities. The specific tests administered andthe order of the tests may be configured on the subject's ability level,competition level, particular activity, and the like. While the test isadministered to the subject, the subject may provide the appropriateresponse by interacting with an input device that is connected to thetest unit via an input component. This is indicated at block 620.Multiple input devices may be used, and more than one input may bereceived from the subject. For example, during a split attention test, asubject may provide one response to a visual indicia testing eye-handcoordination, while the subject may provide another response to a visualindicia at a separate location, as described above. A processingcomponent (e.g., processing component 118 in FIG. 1) may then processthe received input by, for example, collecting the data, determining ascore, or developing a training regimen. The data may be stored, forexample, in database 104, or sent via a delivery component to, forexample, central location 106. This is indicated at block 630.

Optionally, at block 640, the data received from the subject's inputwith each test may be used to determine a score for the subject. Anindividual score may be determined for each test, and an overall scoremay be determined based on the data from all tests. The score mayfurther be based on corresponding data for a particular population, andthe subject's score may be compared accordingly (e.g., the subject maybe given a percentile of their performance). At block 650, a trainingregimen may be developed for the test subject to train his or her visionand coordination abilities based on, for example, their determined scoreand their received input in response to the vision ability tests.

The present invention has been described in relation to particularembodiments, which are intended in all respects to be illustrativerather than restrictive. Alternative embodiments will become apparent tothose of ordinary skill in the art to which the present inventionpertains without departing from its scope.

From the foregoing, it will be seen that this invention is one welladapted to attain all the ends and objects set forth above, togetherwith other advantages which are obvious and inherent to the system andmethod. It will be understood that certain features and sub-combinationsare of utility and may be employed without reference to other featuresand sub-combinations. This is contemplated by and is within the scope ofthe claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A device for testing the visual and coordinationability of a subject comprising: a presenting component configured topresent two or more vision and coordination ability tests, wherein avision and coordination ability test includes a test that measures boththe vision and coordination of a subject, and wherein the subjectprovides input in response to each test; an input component configuredto receive the input provided by the subject; a processing componentconfigured to process the received input and to determine a score basedon the received input; and a training development component thatprovides a vision and coordination training regimen based on thedetermined score.
 2. The device of claim 1, wherein one of the two ormore vision and coordination ability tests includes an eye-handcoordination test.
 3. The device of claim 2, wherein the eye-handcoordination test comprises a visual indicia presented to the subjectthat the subject locates by providing an input in response to thelocation of the visual indicia.
 4. The device of claim 1, wherein one ofthe two or more vision and coordination ability tests includes a splitattention test.
 5. The device of claim 4, wherein the split attentiontest comprises a first visual indicia presented to the subject at afirst location that the subject provides an input in response tolocating the first visual indicia and a second visual indicia presentedto the subject at a second location that requires a response from thesubject.
 6. The device of claim 5, wherein the second visual indicia isa Landolt C.
 7. The device of claim 1, wherein one of the two or morevision and coordination ability tests includes a reaction time test. 8.The device of claim 1, wherein the one of the two or more vision andcoordination ability tests includes a body coordination test.
 9. Amethod of testing the vision and coordination ability of a test subject,wherein the method occurs at a unitary location, the method comprising:administering two or more vision and coordination ability tests to atest subject, wherein a vision and coordination ability test is a testthat measures both the vision and coordination of a subject; receivinginput from the test subject in response to each test; processing thereceived input; determining a score based on the received input; andproviding a vision and coordination training regimen based on thedetermined score.
 10. The method of claim 9, wherein one of the two ormore vision and coordination tests includes an eye-hand coordinationtest.
 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the eye-hand coordination testcomprises a visual indicia presented to the subject that the subjectlocates by providing an input in response to the location of the visualindicia.
 12. The method of claim 9, wherein one of the two or morevision and coordination ability tests includes a split attention test.13. The method of claim 12, wherein the split attention test comprises afirst visual indicia presented to the subject at a first location thatthe subject provides an input in response to locating the first visualindicia and a second visual indicia presented to the subject at a secondlocation that requires a response from the subject.
 14. The method ofclaim 13, wherein the second visual indicia is a Landolt C.
 15. Themethod of claim 9, wherein one of the two or more vision andcoordination ability tests includes a reaction time test.
 16. The methodof claim 15, wherein one of the two or more vision and coordinationability tests includes a body coordination test.
 17. A method of testingthe vision and coordination ability of a test subject, wherein themethod occurs at a unitary location, the method comprising:administering at least an eye-hand coordination test and a splitattention test to a test subject; receiving a first input from the testsubject in response to the eye-hand coordination test; receiving asecond input from the test subject in response to the split attentiontest; processing the first input and the second input; determining ascore based on the processed first input and the processed second input;and providing a vision and coordination training regimen based on thedetermined score.